John Paul Schroeder v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Good Law
999 F.2d 544·1993 WL 280395·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25810
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199392-35288California496 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Paul SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35288. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 3, 1993. * Decided July 26, 1993. 1 Before PREGERSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 John Paul Schroeder, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and review the denial de novo. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 4 Petitioner contends that the district court erred by holding that the application by the Oregon State Board of Parole (the the minimum sentences, but retained the other four, and set Schroeder's minimum term between 196 and 264 months. 5 Petitioner contends that the Board should have applied the rules which were in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.