United States v. Reynard Campbell

999 F.2d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reynard CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant, No. 91-10546. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1993. Decided July 12, 1993. Before FLETCHER, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Reynard Campbell appeals his conviction for making a false statement to the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1988). Campbell argues that his conviction should be overturned because (1) the superceding indictment did not properly charge a § 1001 violation; (2) the district judge's jury instructions on the § 1001 count were impermissibly confusing; (3) the judge erred in summarizing testimony on the IRS's decision to audit one of his clients; (4) his sister's testimony was impermissibly limited; and (5) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his § 1001 conviction. We have jurisdiction over…