Abbes Rahal v. City of San Jose Santa Clara County Transportation Agency

999 F.2d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abbes RAHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.; Santa Clara County Transportation Agency, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16487. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Abbes Rahal appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 motion to vacate the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action for lack of prosecution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Rahal filed his complaint on November 2, 1989, alleging violations of his civil rights by the San Jose Police Department ("SJPD"). He asserted that he was detained and searched by the SJPD without probable cause for being a terrorist and that, during the search, the SJPD confiscated several items of his personal property. 4 The district court scheduled a May 3, 1991…