William Stanley v. The Board of County Commissioners of Shoshone County, Idaho

999 F.2d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William STANLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SHOSHONE COUNTY, IDAHO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35607. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 18, 1993. Decided July 6, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, FLETCHER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 William Stanley appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Shoshone County Board of Commissioners ("Board") in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Stanley contends that the Board violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process by demoting him without notice and a hearing. We review de novo, T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pacific. Elec. Contractors Ass'n, 809 F.2d 626 , 629 (9th Cir.1987), and we reverse. 3 In May 1984, the Board hired Stanley as a road supervisor; his salary was $2,234.22 per month and he had the use of a county vehicle for transportation from his home to his…