Eugene Soliz v. United States

999 F.2d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eugene SOLIZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55097. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 9, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Eugene Soliz appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action against the United States as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court dismissed appellant's action without prejudice on the ground that the complaint failed to set forth a short and plain statement of his claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). The complaint, which is comprised of two single-spaced pages of unintelligible ramblings by appellant, clearly fails to comply with Rule 8(a). See Nevijel v. North Coast Life Ins. Co., 651 F.2d 671, 673 (9th Cir.1981). 4 In addition, to the…