United States v. Guadalupe P. Pecina, United States of America v. Larry Lummus

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guadalupe P. PECINA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry LUMMUS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10167, 92-10170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 16, 1993. * Decided July 23, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Appealing from his conviction of narcotics and weapons violations, Pecina challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Lummus appeals his conviction and sentence for narcotics violations. The district court exercised jurisdiction pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over these timely appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 2 Pecina contends that the warrant failed to describe the premises to be searched with sufficient particularity because it contained no reference to the…