United States v. Alvarado Gallego, Aka, Gonzale Jairo, Garcia Ivan Cardona, Electrico, Jimmy Nono, and Cardona J. Ivan

Good Law
999 F.2d 545·1993 WL 283590·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26311
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 199392-15517California1,750 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alvarado GALLEGO, aka, Gonzale Jairo, Garcia Ivan Cardona, Electrico, Jimmy Nono, and Cardona J. Ivan, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1993. * Decided July 27, 1993. Before BROWNING, CHOY and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alvarado Gallego appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to vacate sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. 3 We review the denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition de novo. United States v. Espinoza, 866 F.2d 1067, 1069 (9th Cir.1988). To obtain habeas relief based on an error of law, a petitioner must show "the claimed error constituted 'a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.