United States v. William Roger Reaves
Opinion
Opinion
999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Roger REAVES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50035. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 13, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Roger Reaves appeals his pre-Guidelines sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to conspiring to make materially false statements to the United States Customs Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 , to defraud the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , to travel in interstate and foreign commerce in aid of a racketeering enterprise in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952 , and to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . Reaves contends that the district court abused its discretion by ordering his five-year term of imprisonment to run consecutively to earlier-imposed federal sentences. We have jurisdiction under 28…