United States v. Darin Craig Hart

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darin Craig HART, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 6, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darin Craig Hart appeals his conviction and sentence following entry of a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). 3 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hart's counsel submitted a brief identifying three possible issues for review: (1) application of mandatory minimum sentences based on drug quantities for drug offense convictions is a violation of equal protection; (2) Hart's sentence is disproportionate to the crime of which he was convicted; and (3) Hart's sentence is disproportionate to that received by his allegedly more culpable…