United States v. Raul M. Ramos

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul M. RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50498. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 6, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raul M. Ramos appeals his conviction and 60-month sentence following entry a guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramos' counsel filed a brief which identified four possible issues for review: (1) whether the district court erred by not allowing Ramos to withdraw his guilty plea; (2) whether Ramos was denied effective assistance of counsel during the plea and sentencing proceedings; (3) whether Ramos' due process rights were violated because he was prosecuted in federal rather than state…