United States v. Samuele Manno

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuele MANNO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30089. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1993. * Decided July 21, 1993. 1 Before PREGERSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges; LEGGE, District Judge ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Defendant Samuele Manno appeals after pleading guilty to cocaine possession with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The appeal concerns appellant's pretrial motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. I. 4 The district court held an evidentiary hearing on appellant's motion to suppress the evidence found in his vehicle. Appellant argued that his stop by the police was pretextual, that the detention following the stop was a ploy to hold him and search his car, that he did not consent to the search, and in the alternative, if he did consent, his…