United States v. David Wayne Means

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Wayne MEANS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1993. Decided July 21, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, TANG, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 David Wayne Means appeals on several grounds his conviction and sentence for transporting stolen and forged checks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 . We affirm the conviction, but remand for sentencing to conform the amount of restitution to the underlying factual record. I. 3 In October 1987, David Wayne Means, Randall Yates, and Denise Maddin relocated from Nashville, Tennessee to Kauai, Hawaii. The three obtained employment at the Westin Kauai Resort and resided together. Two months later, Maddin returned to Nashville. In March 1988, Means and Yates also returned to Nashville. Then, between April and June 1988, eight forged Westin…