United States v. Sue Monroe

999 F.2d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sue MONROE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1993. * Decided July 27, 1993. Before CANBY, WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 After a jury trial, Sue C. Monroe 1 was convicted of bank fraud, possessing and uttering forged securities, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 513 (a), 1344, and 1957(a). She appeals her convictions and sentence. We affirm. I. Denial of Pre-Trial Motions A. Motion to Suppress Evidence 3 Monroe contends that the federal agents who executed the warrant for her arrest violated the knock-and-announce provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 . She further argues that, absent the observations of the officers who entered her Chicago apartment to arrest her, the affidavits supporting the search warrant for the apartment were insufficient…