United States v. Jerry Lamar Stovall

999 F.2d 546 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Lamar STOVALL, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50613, 92-50037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 6, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Jerry Lamar Stovall appeals his 151-month sentence, imposed following a jury trial, for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Stovall contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant him a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's determination that Stovall did not accept responsibility, see United States v. Ford, 989 F.2d 347, 352 (9th Cir.1993), and we accord great deference…