Randal N. Wiideman v. Juan P. Ignacio, Individually

999 F.2d 546 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randal N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Juan P. IGNACIO, individually, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15297. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randal N. Wiideman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order imposing a $200.00 sanction against him pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. In this consolidated action, Wiideman alleged that certain prison officials had embezzled money and killed a former prison employee. Additionally, Wiideman also submitted a forged document from a United States federal government agency. We review the district court's imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion. Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp., 929 F.2d 1358, 1365-66 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. 3 Rule 11 provides that an unrepresented party shall sign all papers filed with the court to…