E.P. Paup Company Insurance Company of North America v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Arthur McDougall State of Washington, Department of Labor and Industries, Respondent-Intervenor. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs v. E.P. Paup Company Insurance Company of North America, Inc. Arthur McDougall
Opinion
Opinion
999 F.2d 1341 1994 A.M.C. 1809 E.P. PAUP COMPANY; Insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Arthur McDougall, Respondents, State of Washington, Department of Labor and Industries, Respondent-Intervenor. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Petitioner, v. E.P. PAUP COMPANY; Insurance Company of North America, Inc.; Arthur McDougall, Respondents. Nos. 91-70325, 91-70350. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1992. Decided July 2, 1993. Thomas Owen McElmeel, McElmeel & Schultz, Seattle, WA, for petitioners. 1 David S. Fortney, Deputy Sol. of Labor, Carol A. DeDeo, Associate Sol., Janet R. Dunlop, Counsel for Longshore, Michael S. Hertzig, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondent Director. 2 Kenneth Hobbs, Stafford, Frey, Cooper & Stewart, Seattle, WA, for respondent Arthur L. McDougall. 3 John R. Wasberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Washington, Dept. of Labor and Industries, Seattle, WA, for respondent-intervenor. 4 Petitions for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. 5 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, SKOPIL,…