E.P. Paup Company Insurance Company of North America v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Arthur McDougall State of Washington, Department of Labor and Industries, Respondent-Intervenor. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs v. E.P. Paup Company Insurance Company of North America, Inc. Arthur McDougall

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 8617·999 F.2d 1341·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16090·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5092
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 199391-70325California6,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 1341 1994 A.M.C. 1809 E.P. PAUP COMPANY; Insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Arthur McDougall, Respondents, State of Washington, Department of Labor and Industries, Respondent-Intervenor. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Petitioner, v. E.P. PAUP COMPANY; Insurance Company of North America, Inc.; Arthur McDougall, Respondents. Nos. 91-70325, 91-70350. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1992. Decided July 2, 1993. Thomas Owen McElmeel, McElmeel & Schultz, Seattle, WA, for petitioners. 1 David S. Fortney, Deputy Sol. of Labor, Carol A. DeDeo, Associate Sol., Janet R. Dunlop, Counsel for Longshore, Michael S. Hertzig, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondent Director. 2 Kenneth Hobbs, Stafford, Frey, Cooper & Stewart, Seattle, WA, for respondent Arthur L. McDougall. 3 John R. Wasberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Washington, Dept. of Labor and Industries, Seattle, WA, for respondent-intervenor. 4 Petitions for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. 5 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, SKOPIL,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.