Singh

Singh v. Holder

Good Law
448 F. App'x 738
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 201107-73589California577 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner argues that the BIA erred in finding that changed country conditions in India rebutted the presumption that he had a well-founded fear of persecution. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , grant the petition for review, and remand.

“The Attorney General has discretion to grant asylum to any alien who qualifies as a ‘refugee’ within the meaning of section 101(a)(42)(A) of the [Immigration and Nationality Act].” Rahimzadeh v. Holder, 613 F.3d 916, 920 (9th Cir.2010). It is the applicant’s burden to establish his status as a refugee, 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(l)(B)(i), which is defined as a person “unable or unwilling” to return to his home country “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion,” id. § 1101(a)(42)(A); see also Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 654 (9th Cir.2000).

“A finding of ‘well-founded fear of persecution’ requires both a showing of ‘subjectively genuine’ and ‘objectively reasonable’ fear.” Zhao v. Mukasey, 540 F.3d 1027, 1029 (9th Cir.2008) (quoting Ladha v. INS, 215 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.2000)). “The subjective component…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.