Alvarez

Alvarez v. Chevron Corp.

Good Law
656 F.3d 925·2011 WL 3850660·75 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 545·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18211
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 201109-56698California3,900 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

Appellants Jonathan Alvarez, Emanuel Jiminez, Shaun McCracken, Housam Moumne, Mohammad Moumne, and Kent Cochran (collectively Plaintiffs), appeal the district court’s dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of their putative consumer class action against Chevron USA, Inc., Exxon-Mobile Corp., Conocophillips Co., BP Products North America Inc., BP West Coast Products, LLC, Equilon Enterprises, LLC, Shell Oil Co., and Valero California Retail Co. (collectively Defendants). Plaintiffs also appeal the district court’s denial of leave to amend their second amended complaint.

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint alleged that the design of Defendants’ retail gasoline dispensers was fundamentally flawed due to a residual fuel occurrence: when Plaintiffs purchased premium grade fuel, they received between two and three-tenths of a gallon of residual fuel from the previous transaction, and therefore were overcharged when the previous purchaser had selected mid-range or regular grade fuel. Plaintiffs sought to have Defendants remedy this situation by developing a more accurate dispenser or pricing technology, or displaying disclosures at the point of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.