Charles Dirks v. Joe Grasso
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 201109-56187California1,760 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEP 02 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CHARLES DIRKS, No. 09-56187
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-02664-GAF-
FMO
v.
JOE GRASSO; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 9, 2010 Pasadena, California
Before: NOONAN, BERZON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department officers appeal the district court’s
order denying in part their renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law in a suit
brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Professor Charles Dirks (“Dirks”). The
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. officers—Sargent Joe Grasso (“Grasso”) and Deputies Ricky Baker and Darren
Inana (“Baker” and “Inana”)—brought the renewed motion after a jury deadlocked
on Dirks’s unlawful arrest and…