Rosas-Castaneda

Rosas-Castaneda v. Holder

Bad Law
655 F.3d 875·2011 WL 4014321
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 201110-70087California5,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

SILVERMAN., J.

John M. DeStefano, III (argued), Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ, for the petitioner.

Tony West, Assistant Attorney General; Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director; James E. Grimes (argued), Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Before: ROBERT E. COWEN, [*] A. WALLACE TASHIMA, and BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN.

The opinion filed on January 4, 2011, and published at 630 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2011) is amended as follows:

With the opinion as amended, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Silverman has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Cowen and Tashima have so recommended. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

No future petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.