Pirtle

Pirtle v. California Board of Prison Terms

Good Law
450 F. App'x 616
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201107-16097California97 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

On remand from the Supreme Court, California state prisoner John Pirtle renews his argument that the California Parole Board’s 2002 denial of his parole vio lated his federal right to due process. In light of Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 859 , 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam), we hold that Pirtle’s right to due process was not violated. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s judgment granting the writ of habeas corpus.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.