Stokley

Stokley v. Ryan

Good Law
659 F.3d 802·2011 WL 4436268·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19611
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 201109-99004California6,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

Richard Dale Stokley was sentenced to death for the murder of two thirteen-year-old girls. Stokley challenges that sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , arguing that he should receive an evidentiary hearing to develop the claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing by failing adequately to investigate and present evidence that Stokley suffered from organic brain damage at the time of the murders. Although trial counsel’s actions may seem imperfect in hindsight, counsel undertook an extensive investigation into Stokley’s mental health, arranged for him to be evaluated by a neuropsychologist, and presented testimony from a psychologist and a neurologist. Under the demanding standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), Stokley has not presented a colorable claim that counsel’s actions were constitutionally ineffective. We affirm the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing.

Background

On July 7, 1991, Stokley was in Elfrida, Arizona, working as a stuntman in Independence Day celebrations. According to Stokley, he asked Randy Brazeal to drive him to a location where Stokley could bathe. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.