United States v. Ottoneil Tejada-Yanez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 201110-10368California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10368

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00293-GMS

v.

MEMORANDUM *

OTTONEIL TEJADA-YANEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011 **

Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Ottoniel Tejada-Yanez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

60-month sentence for re-entry of removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Tejada-Yanez’s counsel has

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as counsel of record. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.