United States v. Ernesto Felix
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 201110-10427California257 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10427
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00736-DGC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERNESTO FELIX,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011 **
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Ernesto Felix appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and the 69-month
sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Felix’s counsel has filed a
brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel of record. We have…