Russell Country Sportsmen v. United States Forest Service

Good Law
668 F.3d 1037·73 ERC 1979
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 201110-35623, 10-35784California5,579 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

We decide whether the United States Forest Service’s (Service) 2007 Travel Management Plan for parts of the Lewis and Clark National Forest, including the Middle Fork Judith Wilderness Study Area, violates the Montana Wilderness Study Act of 1977 (Study Act) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We hold that nothing in the Study Act, which requires the Service to manage a wilderness study area so as to “maintain” its wilderness character as it existed in 1977, prohibits the Service from exercising its discretion to enhance the wilderness character of a study area. We also hold that NEPA does not require the Service to prepare a supplemental draft environmental impact statement (EIS) where, as here, the final decision makes only minor changes and is qualitatively within the spectrum of the alternatives discussed in the draft EIS. We accordingly reverse the judgment of the district court.

Background

In 2007, the Service issued a revised Travel Management Plan governing recreational motorized and nonmotorized use on 1.1 million acres of the Lewis and Clark National Forest. The area covered by the travel plan encompasses the Little Belt Mountains, the Castle…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.