Smallwood

Smallwood v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.

Good Law
660 F.3d 1115·2011 WL 4927404·2012 A.M.C. 370·2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 201109-56714California3,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

Gary Smallwood contracted with Allied Van Lines, Inc. and SIRVA, Inc. (collectively, AVL) to move some of his household goods from southern California to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and to move the remainder of the goods — including a box full of firearms and ammunition — to storage. Instead, AVL shipped his weapons to the UAE. When UAE officials discovered Smallwood’s weapons, they arrested him, imprisoned him for 11 days and tricked him into pleading guilty to smuggling firearms. Smallwood alleges that he is facing deportation from the UAE and sues AVL based on various tort and contract theories. We must decide whether AVL may compel Smallwood to arbitrate pursuant to a foreign arbitration clause in their shipment contract. We hold that the contract’s foreign arbitration clause is unenforceable.

The district court denied AVL’s motion to compel arbitration, concluding that the shipment was governed by the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706 , and that the statute precludes enforcement of foreign arbitration clauses. AVL argues that the district court misinterpreted Car-mack and created an unnecessary conflict with federal arbitration law, which, according to AVL,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.