John Loudermilk v. Michael Danner
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 201110-15980California225 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY No. 10-15980 LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00636-EHC Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin District of Arizona, Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Phoenix Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children,
ORDER
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
MICHAEL DANNER,
Defendant - Appellant,
RICHARD GAGNON,
Defendant - Appellant,
JOSHUA RAY,
Defendant - Appellant,
JOSEPH SOUSA, Maricopa County Deputy Sheriffs, individually and in their official capacity,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO,
Defendant,
JULIE RHODES,
Defendant,
RHONDA CASH,
Defendant,
JENNA CRAMER,
Defendant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the
petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no
judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.…