John Loudermilk v. Michael Danner

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 201110-15980California225 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY No. 10-15980 LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00636-EHC Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin District of Arizona, Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Phoenix Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children,

ORDER

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

MICHAEL DANNER,

Defendant - Appellant,

RICHARD GAGNON,

Defendant - Appellant,

JOSHUA RAY,

Defendant - Appellant,

JOSEPH SOUSA, Maricopa County Deputy Sheriffs, individually and in their official capacity,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

JOSEPH M. ARPAIO,

Defendant,

JULIE RHODES,

Defendant,

RHONDA CASH,

Defendant,

JENNA CRAMER,

Defendant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the

petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no

judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.