United States v. Roberto Aguilar-Escobedo

MEMORANDUM

Roberto Aguilar-Escobedo appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2258 , and we affirm.

Aguilar-Escobedo contends that his attorney was ineffective for failing to present a sentencing entrapment defense at trial. As the district court concluded, counsel’s representation did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.