Haghighatpour
Haghighatpour v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 201107-70872California2,257 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 27 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S . CO UR T OF AP PE A LS
MOHSEN HAGHIGHATPOUR, No. 07-70872
Petitioner, Agency No. A023-387-462
v.
ORDER
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
MOHSEN HAGHIGHATPOUR, No. 07-73100
Petitioner, Agency No. A023-387-462
v.
ORDER
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The Memorandum Disposition filed on July 27, 2011 is amended as follows:
Replace the paragraph on pages 8-9 that states ä5. Substantial evidence
supports the BIA's rejection of Haghighatpour's Convention Against Torture
(CAT) claim, which was premised on the possibility that Germany would deport him to Iran and on his inability to worµ in his chosen field in Germany. Nothing in
the record beyond Haghighatpour's assertions indicates that Germany is liµely to
deport him to Iran. And the inability to find employment in one's chosen field
does not amount to torture.â with…