United States v. Mario Alvarado

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 201110-10479California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10479

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01432-NVW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MARIO SAUL ALVARADO, a.k.a. Daniel Pineda,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011 **

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Mario Saul Alvarado appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month

sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarado’s counsel has filed a brief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.