United States v. Eduardo Lara-Flores

Good Law
452 F. App'x 736
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 201111-10102California348 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10102

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00232-GMN

v.

MEMORANDUM *

EDUARDO ANTONIO LARA-FLORES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011 **

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Lara-Flores appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United

States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Lara-Flores contends that the district court erred because it failed to address

his mitigating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.