22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T43f,MEMORANDUM Efrain Razo-Maya appeals from the 24- month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. Razo-Maya contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he has no prior felony convictions. As Razo-Maya’s concedes, his prior gross misdemeanor conviction qualified as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43). See United States v. Gonzalez-Tamariz, 310 F.3d 1168, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2002). Thus, the district court did not err in imposing an eight-level sentencing enhancement. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T46c,

MEMORANDUM

Efrain Razo-Maya appeals from the 24- month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Razo-Maya contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he has no prior felony convictions. As Razo-Maya’s concedes, his prior gross misdemeanor conviction qualified as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43). See United States v. Gonzalez-Tamariz, 310 F.3d 1168, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2002). Thus, the district court did not err in imposing an eight-level sentencing enhancement. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.