United States v. Eliza Bighetty

Good Law
456 F. App'x 663
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 201111-30009California123 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Eliza H.R. Bighetty appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea convictions for aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, and for theft of government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Bighetty contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects that Bighetty’s within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.