Manuel Arriola v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
456 F. App'x 675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 201110-73663California238 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Manuel Arriola, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Cere-zo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, Si-meonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

We reject Arriola’s contention that he is eligible for withholding of removal based on his membership in a particular social group, namely, young Salvadoran men who oppose gang membership. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 746-47 (9th Cir.2008) (rejecting as a particular social group “young [men] in El Salvador resisting gang violence”). Arriola’s arguments that Matter of S-E-G-, 24 I. & N. Dec. 579 (BIA 2008), was wrongly decided, and that ‘social visibility’ and ‘particularity’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.