Anthony Hammonds v. Charles Harrison

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 201109-55124California298 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED

NOV 02 2011

ANTHONY DEWAYNE HAMMONDS, No. 09-55124

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:05-cv-00379-ODW-OP Central District of California v.

CHARLES M. HARRISON, Warden, ORDER

Respondent - Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and NAVARRO, District Judge.*

The memorandum disposition in the above-captioned matter filed on

October 12, 2011 is amended as follows:

At page 4, change

about the methamphetamine lab and continued to visit, if not live with, his son at

the property, the state appellate court concluded that Hammonds’s counsel made a

reasonable tactical decision not to interview the witnesses because certain

testimony was immaterial, and the admission of the remaining testimony would not

have resulted in a different outcome.> to

* The Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. that Hammonds knew about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.