Anthony Hammonds v. Charles Harrison
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 201109-55124California298 words
Opinion
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED
NOV 02 2011
ANTHONY DEWAYNE HAMMONDS, No. 09-55124
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:05-cv-00379-ODW-OP Central District of California v.
CHARLES M. HARRISON, Warden, ORDER
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: SCHROEDER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and NAVARRO, District Judge.*
The memorandum disposition in the above-captioned matter filed on
October 12, 2011 is amended as follows:
At page 4, change about the methamphetamine lab and continued to visit, if not live with, his son at the property, the state appellate court concluded that Hammonds’s counsel made a reasonable tactical decision not to interview the witnesses because certain testimony was immaterial, and the admission of the remaining testimony would not have resulted in a different outcome.> to * The Honorable Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. that Hammonds knew about…