Harris Thermal Transfer Produc v. James River Insurance Company

Good Law
457 F. App'x 660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 201110-35712, 10-35749California405 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Harris Thermal Transfer Products, Inc. (Harris Thermal) and James River Insurance Company (James' River) cross-appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of James River and the district court’s denial of Harris Thermal’s motion for summary judgment. We review de novo a district court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment. Redevelopment Agency of City of Stockton v. BNSF Ry. Co., 643 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir.2011).

From the allegations in Delta-T’s counterclaims, it is plain that Delta-T’s claims “directly ... [arose] out of or resulted] from the design or manufacture of any goods or products ... sold or supplied by [Harris Thermal].” Thus, these claims fall squarely within the coverage exclusion set forth in Section III(j) of the policy that Harris Thermal held with James River. Further, Delta-T’s claims are, as alleged, attributable to “faulty workmanship, construction[,] or work not in accordance with [design specifications].” Thus, Delta-T’s claims also squarely fall within the coverage exclusion set forth in Section 111(8). Either exclusion is sufficient to negate James River’s duty to defend. Accordingly, with respect to the duty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.