Chambers

Chambers v. Santa Clara County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 201107-17240California495 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL E. CHAMBERS, No. 07-17240

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-05-03308-SI

v.

MEMORANDUM *

SANTA CLARA COUNTY; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011 **

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Daniel E. Chambers appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his

constitutional rights and committed state tort violations in connection with

dependency proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Tamas v. Dep’t of Soc. & Health Servs.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.