Chambers
Chambers v. Santa Clara County
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 02 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL E. CHAMBERS, No. 07-17240
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-05-03308-SI
v.
MEMORANDUM *
SANTA CLARA COUNTY; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2011 **
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Daniel E. Chambers appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his
constitutional rights and committed state tort violations in connection with
dependency proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Tamas v. Dep’t of Soc. & Health Servs.,…