William Whitsitt v. Jean Zedlitz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 201108-17526California882 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 02 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, No. 08-17526
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:08-cv-01803-JSW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JEAN ZEDLITZ; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2011 **
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
William J. Whitsitt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from
a traffic stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo
the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Procedure 12(b)(6) and…