Kelvin Williams v. Dan Richey
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 201110-56318California470 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 08 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KELVIN NEAL WILLIAMS, No. 10-56318
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00327-DOC-
AGR
v.
DAN RICHEY, Officer; MCCAMY, MEMORANDUM * Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 8, 2011 **
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Kelvin Neal Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
excessive force in connection with his arrest. We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Luchtel v. Hagemann, 623 F.3d 975, 978…