Kelvin Williams v. Dan Richey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 201110-56318California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 08 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELVIN NEAL WILLIAMS, No. 10-56318

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00327-DOC-

AGR

v.

DAN RICHEY, Officer; MCCAMY, MEMORANDUM * Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2011 **

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Kelvin Neal Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

excessive force in connection with his arrest. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Luchtel v. Hagemann, 623 F.3d 975, 978…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.