Lacey

Lacey v. Maricopa County

Good Law
649 F.3d 1118
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 201109-15703California204 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION NOV 10 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; No. 09-15703

PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC,

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997-SRB Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. ORDER

MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity; JOSEPH ARPAIO, Sheriff, and AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife; DENNIS WILENCHIK and BECKY BARTNESS, husband and wife; JOHN

DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK

CORPORATIONS, I-V; and WHITE

PARTNERSHIPS, I-V,

Defendants - Appellees.

MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; No. 09-15806

PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC,

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00997-SRB Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff and husband; AVA ARPAIO, wife; JOHN

DOES I-X; JANE DOES I-X; BLACK

CORPORATIONS, I-V; WHITE

Page

PARTNERSHIPS, I-V; MARICOPA

COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, a public entity,

Defendants,

and

DENNIS WILENCHIK; BECKY

BARTNESS, wife,

Defendants - Appellants.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.