G. M. v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 201111-15085California220 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 16 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

G. M., a minor, by and through his No. 11-15085 Guardian ad litem, Kevin R. Marchese, an individual, and Lyndi Marchese, an D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00944-GEB- individual; et al., GGH

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

ORDER *

v.

DRY CREEK JOINT ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 14, 2011 ** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: NOONAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, and WALTER, Senior District Judge.***

This case is DISMISSED as moot given G.M.’s graduation from Dry Creek

Joint Elementary School District.

G.M.’s request for judicial notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.