Gurung

Gurung v. Holder

Good Law
458 F. App'x 691
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 201108-70201California337 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Gam Gurung, a native and citizen of Nepal, seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing the agency’s factual findings for substantial evidence and applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act, see Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010), we deny the petition for review.

Before the IJ, Gurung testified that: (1) he never voiced his opposition to or opinion of the Nepalese government, directly contradicting an affidavit he submitted in support of his application in which his friend described him as an “avid critic” of the police and army who would raise his concerns at social and religious gatherings; and (2) he did not know whether his brother-in-law’s brother Hari Prasad Bhattarai was involved in politics or anything other than a transport business, directly contradicting his own earlier declaration in which he described Prasad’s membership in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.