Alexander Stern v. Sony Corporation of America

Good Law
459 F. App'x 609
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 201110-55348California368 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff-Appellant Alexander Stern appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), “[n]o individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.” 42 U.S.C. § 12182 (a). In interpreting the term “place of public accommodation” in the context of the long list of “public accommodations” contained in § 12181(7) — all of which “are actual, physical places where goods or services are open to the public” — this Court has found that Title III requires “some connection between the good or service complained of and an actual physical place.” Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 198 F.3d 1104, 1114 (9th Cir.2000). This view is supported by 28 C.F.R. § 36.104 , which specifies that a place of public accommodation is “a facility operated by a private entity,” and defines “facility” to mean “all or any portion of buildings,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.