Perez-Mejia

Perez-Mejia v. Holder

Good Law
663 F.3d 403·2011 WL 5865888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 23, 201107-70118California8,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

Raul Gomez and Araceli S. Perez-Brizo (argued), Law Office of Raul Gomez, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner.

James E. Grimes, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Before: A. WALLACE TASHIMA and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges, and MARK L. WOLF, District Judge. [*]

The motion for leave to file an amicus brief in support of the petitioner's petition for rehearing, filed by Northwest Immigrant Rights Project on August 1, 2011, is GRANTED.

The opinion filed April 21, 2011, and appearing at 641 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2011), is AMENDED. An amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.

With this action, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Fisher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Tashima and Wolf have so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.

WOLF, Chief District Judge:

Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.