United States v. Maximiliano Valdovinos-Espinoz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 201110-10492California256 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10492

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01124-DCB

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MAXIMILIANO VALDOVINOS-

ESPINOZA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2011 **

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Maximiliano Valdovinos-Espinoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction

and 27-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valdovinos-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Espinoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.