United States v. Maximiliano Valdovinos-Espinoz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 201110-10492California256 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 29 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10492
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01124-DCB
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MAXIMILIANO VALDOVINOS-
ESPINOZA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 21, 2011 **
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Maximiliano Valdovinos-Espinoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction
and 27-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valdovinos-
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Espinoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,
along with a motion to withdraw as counsel…