United States v. Jose Valdez-Borrego

Good Law
460 F. App'x 628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 201110-30340California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30340

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00207-BLW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JOSE JUAN VALDEZ-BORREGO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2011 **

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Juan Valdez-Borrego appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-

month sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valdez-Borrego’s counsel has filed a

brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as counsel of record. We have provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.