United States v. Jose Valdez-Borrego
460 F. App'x 628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 201110-30340California393 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 29 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30340
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00207-BLW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JOSE JUAN VALDEZ-BORREGO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 21, 2011 **
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Jose Juan Valdez-Borrego appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-
month sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valdez-Borrego’s counsel has filed a
brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as counsel of record. We have provided…