United States v. Samuel Montes-Llanes

Good Law
460 F. App'x 635
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 201111-10007California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10007

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01402-JMR

v.

MEMORANDUM *

SAMUEL MONTES-LLANES, a.k.a. Samuel Montes-Yanez, a.k.a. Samuel Montez-Yanez,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John M. Roll, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2011 **

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Montes-Llanes appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-

month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Montes-Llanes’s counsel

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.