Mata Castillo v. Holder

Good Law
460 F. App'x 671
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 201107-73716California428 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner Angel Mata Castillo appeals the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA) decision to reverse the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) award of withholding of removal under the immigration statute and for protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Delgado v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1095, 1099-100 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc); Edu v. Holder, 624 F.3d 1137, 1142 (9th Cir.2010). We grant the petition in so far as Castillo relies on the CAT.

As to the claim for asylum, Castillo argues that his criminal conviction for selling and transporting methamphetamine does not qualify as a “particularly serious crime.” 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (b)(3)(B)(ii), § 1158 (b)(2) (A) (ii). The state court imposed a sentence of probation with 168 days of community service and Castillo argues that mitigating factors apply to his case.

We discern no legal error. The Attorney General applies a “strong presumption” that a drug trafficking offense resulting in a sentence of less than five years is a “particularly serious crime.” Miguel-Miguel v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 941, 945-49 (9th Cir.2007); Mahini v. INS, 779 F.2d 1419, 1420-21 (9th Cir.1986). As the seller…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.