United States v. Brittany Smith

Good Law
461 F. App'x 647
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 201110-30322California855 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

A jury convicted Brittany Smith of assault resulting in serious bodily injury. The district court found that the victim’s injury was “permanent or life-threatening bodily injury.” U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(3)(C). The district court then departed downward from the Guidelines to sentence Smith to 30 months in prison; consequently, it is unclear whether Smith suffered any prejudice from the court’s imposition of the seven-point enhancement associated with “permanent or life-threatening bodily injury.” We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Smith claims the district court erred by determining that the victim suffered “permanent or life-threatening bodily injury” because the injury did not involve “a substantial risk of death; loss or substantial impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty that is likely to be permanent; or an obvious disfigurement that is likely to be permanent.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1 comment. (n.l(J)). Smith argues that the five-point enhancement associated with “serious bodily injury” was the proper enhancement. We review the procedural soundness of the sentence for abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.