United States v. Jackson Baugus

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 201110-30215California248 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30215

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:02-cr-00133-SEH

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JACKSON BRYANT BAUGUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Jackson Bryant Baugus appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his

motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2). Baugus contends that the district court improperly applied $7,724 in seized

funds to an unsatisfied fine of $75,000 imposed in connection with his 2004

criminal judgment. Contrary to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.