United States v. Jackson Baugus
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 201110-30215California248 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 22 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30215
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:02-cr-00133-SEH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JACKSON BRYANT BAUGUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Jackson Bryant Baugus appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his
motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2). Baugus contends that the district court improperly applied $7,724 in seized
funds to an unsatisfied fine of $75,000 imposed in connection with his 2004
criminal judgment. Contrary to…